Case Detail

United States v. Ousama M. Naaman (D.D.C. 2008)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • United States v. Ousama M. Naaman (D.D.C. 2008)
  • Date Filed
  • 08/07/2008
  • Enforcement Agency
  • DOJ
  • Countries
  • Iraq
  • Foreign Official
  • Ministry of Oil and unspecified Iraqi government officials.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2001 to 2008
  • Nature of Business
  • Sale of gasoline additives used in the refining of leaded gasoline and some types of jet fuel.  Ousama M. Naaman is a Lebanese/Canadian dual national, with principal business offices in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.  In its SEC filings, Innospec Inc., a Delaware corporation based in the United Kingdom, identified Naaman as having acted as its agent in Iraq.  In that role, Naaman negotiated contracts with the Iraqi Ministry of Oil for the provision of gasoline additives to oil refineries operating in Iraq.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • In April 1995, the U.N. adopted Security Council Resolution 986, which permitted the government of Iraq to sell oil and to use proceeds from those sales to purchase humanitarian supplies such as food for the Iraqi people (“U.N. Oil-for-Food Program”).  In an extensive scheme, the Iraqi government received illicit payments in the form of surcharges from oil purchasers and kickbacks, often termed “after sales service fees,” from humanitarian goods suppliers.  The kickback payments were masked by inflating the contract price, usually by 10% of the contract value.
     
    From March 2001 to February 2008, Naaman promised or paid kickback payments of over $8.5 million to Iraqi government officials in exchange for contracts with the Ministry of Oil to purchase a chemical additive from Innospec, a U.S. company.  Between 2001 and 2003, Naaman negotiated five agreements under the U.N. Oil-for-Food Program, including a 10% increase in the price to cover the kickback, and routed a total of approximately $5,000,000 to Iraqi government accounts in the Middle East.  In 2004 and 2008, Naaman also entered two long-term agreements with the Ministry of Oil under which bribes of $3,279,600 were promised and $167,000 was paid to officials.  Naaman also paid an official in the Trade Bank of Iraq in exchange for a favorable exchange rate on letters of credit for purchases under the 2004 agreement.  Naaman created false invoices for reimbursement of the illicit payments, causing Innospec to conceal the payments and falsify its consolidated books and records.  During this time, Naaman also arranged or paid approximately $91,061 in travel, gifts, and entertainment expenses for Iraqi senior officials.  Naaman told Innospec executives that he agreed to pay $150,000 in bribes to Ministry of Oil officials to ensure Innospec’s competitors’ product would fail field trial tests, but this money was retained by Naaman and never paid to Iraqi officials.
     
  • Enforcement
  • Naaman was originally indicted on August 7, 2008.  On July 30, 2009, Naaman was arrested in Frankfurt, Germany and extradited to the United States.  On June 25, 2010, as part of a plea agreement with the DOJ, Naaman pleaded guilty to a two-count superseding information filed June 24, 2001, charging him with one count of conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA, commit wire fraud, and falsify books and records of a U.S. issuer; and one count of violating the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA.  The government expressly reserved all of its rights in connection with sentencing.  On December 22, 2011, Naaman was sentenced to 30 months in prison and fined $250,000.
  • Amount of the Value
  • Over $5 million in kickbacks to the Iraqi government.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • Approximately $40 million in profits.
  • Intermediary
  • Agent
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 250,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No

Defendants

Ousama M. Naaman 

  • Citation
  • United States v. Naaman, No. 1:08-cr-00246 (D.D.C. 2008).
  • Date Filed
  • 08/07/2008
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
    • Conspiracy: Anti-Bribery
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • Conspiracy (Wire Fraud).
  • Disposition
  • Plea Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Agent of Domestic Concern
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • Lebanon, Canada
  • Individual Sanction
  • 30-Months Imprisonment; $250,000 Criminal Fine.
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel