Case Detail

United States v. Innospec, Inc. (D.D.C. 2010)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • United States v. Innospec, Inc. (D.D.C. 2010)
  • Date Filed
  • 03/18/2010
  • Enforcement Agency
  • DOJ
  • Countries
  • Iraq
  • Foreign Official
  • Iraqi government officials (Ministry of Oil).
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2000 to 2008
  • Nature of Business
  • Manufacture and sale of fuel additives and other specialty chemicals by Innospec, Inc. (“Innospec”), a Delaware corporation based in the United Kingdom.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • In April 1995, the U.N. adopted Security Council Resolution 986, which permitted the government of Iraq to sell oil and to use proceeds from those sales to purchase humanitarian supplies such as food for the Iraqi people (“U.N. Oil-for-Food Program”).  In an extensive scheme, the Iraqi government received illicit payments in the form of surcharges from oil purchasers and kickbacks from humanitarian goods suppliers.  
     
    From 2000 to 2008, Innospec paid, or promised to pay, more than $5,800,000 in kickbacks to the Iraqi government and bribes to Iraqi officials to secure contracts to sell tetraethyl lead (“TEL”) to the Iraqi Ministry of Oil.  Innospec’s Swiss subsidiary, Alcor, obtained contracts in the U.N. Oil-for-Food Program by paying kickbacks to Iraq and Iraqi government officials through an Iraqi agent, Ousama Naaman.  After the termination of the U.N. Oil-for-Food Program, Innospec continued to use Naaman to pay bribes to Iraqi officials, including officials at the Iraqi Ministry of Oil, to secure TEL business from Iraq.  Innospec also paid for lavish trips for Iraqi officials, including a honeymoon in Thailand for one and “pocket money” for others during the trips.  
     
  • Enforcement
  • On March 18, 2010, Innospec pleaded guilty to violating the anti-bribery and books and records provisions of the FCPA, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit all three.  
     
    The DOJ’s sentencing memorandum notes that Innospec initially denied culpability but has been cooperating with the DOJ since early 2008, including conducting an extensive internal investigation that resulted in the identification of additional improper payments to officials in Indonesia.  According to the sentencing memorandum, from 2000 until 2005, Innospec paid bribes to Indonesian government officials to induce the purchase of higher levels of TEL than Indonesia required.  The sentencing memorandum notes that this conduct is not charged in the United States because Innospec’s British subsidiary is pleading guilty to it in the United Kingdom.  Payments to the Indonesian officials totaled approximately $2,883,507, and from 2000 to 2005 Innospec’s profits from sales to Indonesia were approximately $21,506,610.  
     
    Innospec will pay $40.2 million as part of a global settlement with the DOJ, the SEC, the U.K. Serious Fraud Office (“SFO”), and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”).  The settlement with OFAC is in connection with the sale of chemicals to Cuban power plants.  Innospec agreed to pay a criminal fine of $14.1 million to the DOJ, disgorgement of $11.2 million to the SEC, a criminal fine of $12.7 million to the SFO, and $2.2 million to OFAC.  Innospec also agreed to injunctive relief and certain undertakings regarding its FCPA compliance program, including retaining an independent compliance monitor for at least three years.  
     
  • Amount of the Value
  • Over $5,800,000.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • Approximately $50 million in profits.
  • Intermediary
  • Sales Agent/Consultant.
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 14,104,800
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • Yes
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 25,304,800

Defendants

Innospec, Inc. 

  • Citation
  • United States v. Innospec, Inc., No. 1:10-cr-00061 (D.D.C. 2010).
  • Date Filed
  • 03/18/2010
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
    • Books-and-Records
    • Conspiracy: Books-and-Records
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • Wire Fraud
  • Disposition
  • Plea Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United Kingdom
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel