(Hong Kong) Limited (2016)" name="description">
Case Detail

United States v. Parametric Technology (Shanghai) Software Co. Ltd. and Parametric Technology (Hong Kong) Limited (2016)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • United States v. Parametric Technology (Shanghai) Software Co. Ltd. and Parametric Technology (Hong Kong) Limited (2016)
  • Date Filed
  • 02/16/2016
  • Enforcement Agency
  • DOJ
  • Countries
  • China
  • Foreign Official
  • Employees of Chinese state-owned entities.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2008 to 2011
  • Nature of Business
  • Parametric Technology (Shanghai) Software Co. Ltd. and Parametric Technology (Hong Kong) Limited (collectively “PTC China”) are wholly owned subsidiaries of PTC Inc. (formerly Parametric Technology Company).  PTC is a Massachusetts corporation headquartered in Needham, Massachusetts.  PTC designs, manufactures, and sells software, including computer aided design software and product lifecycle management software.  PTC’s operations in China, including sales to Chinese customers, are managed through PTC China.  PTC’s stock is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and is listed on NASDAQ.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • According to the DOJ, from at least 2008 to 2011, PTC China provided improper payments of over $1 million to customers who were employed at Chinese state-owned entities to obtain or retain business.  The DOJ claims that PTC China made the improper payments in one of two ways:  (1) by providing over $1 million to third-party agents disguised as commission or sub-contracting payments that were used to pay for non-business foreign travel for the Chinese officials; and (2) by allowing sales staff to provide gifts and excessive entertainment of over $250,000 to the Chinese officials.  During the time period, PTC China entered into more than $13 million in contracts with the Chinese state-owned entities.

    The DOJ claims that PTC China employees and business partners directly or indirectly funded 24 trips that included a recreational component for Chinese officials.  PTC China employees allegedly organized overseas trips in conjunction with visits to a PTC facility.  As part of these business trips, PTC China employees allegedly included several days of sightseeing to destinations such as New York, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, and Hawaii for recreational purposes.

    In addition to the above, between 2009 and 2011, PTC China employees directly provided gifts and entertainment of over $250,000 to Chinese officials, in part to obtain or retain business from state-owned entities.  The gifts and entertainment were made in contravention of PTC’s internal policies which impose approval requirements and monetary limits on gifts and entertainment for government officials.
  • Enforcement
  • On February 16, 2016, the DOJ announced that it had entered into a three-year non-prosecution agreement with PTC China.  According to the agreement, PTC China would pay a criminal penalty of $14.54 million.
  • Amount of the Value
  • Over $1 million.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • Approximately $13 million.
  • Intermediary
  • Local “Business Partners.”
  • Citizenship of Parent Entity
  • United States
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 14,540,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • Yes
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 28,162,000

Defendants

Parametric Technology (Shanghai) Software Co. Ltd. 

  • Citation
  • United States v. Parametric Tech. (Shanghai) Software Co. Ltd.(2016).
  • Date Filed
  • 02/16/2016
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Non-Prosecution Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United States

Parametric Technology (Hong Kong) Limited

  • Citation
  • United States v. Parametric Tech. (Shanghai) Software Co. Ltd.(2016).
  • Date Filed
  • 02/16/2016
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Non-Prosecution Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United States
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel