Case Detail

United States v. Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (S.D. Cal. 2011)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • United States v. Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (S.D. Cal. 2011)
  • Date Filed
  • 01/31/2011
  • Enforcement Agency
  • DOJ
  • Countries
  • China
  • Foreign Official
  • Officials at Chinese state-owned entities.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2002 to 2009
  • Nature of Business
  • Marketing and sales of high-voltage capacitors to Chinese state-owned entities by Maxwell S.A., a wholly-owned Swiss subsidiary of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (“Maxwell”).  Maxwell is a Delaware corporation that manufactures energy storage and power delivery products.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • From at least July 2002 through May 2009, Maxwell S.A. paid more than $2,789,131 to a third-party sales agent in China to secure sales contracts for high-voltage capacitors with Chinese state-owned manufacturers of electrical-utility infrastructure.  The agent accomplished these payments by inflating purchase orders by 20%, then distributing the extra amount to officials at the state-owned entities and accounting for these fees as commission expenses in Maxwell’s books and records.  Maxwell’s U.S. management discovered the bribery scheme in late 2002.  However, payments to the agent only increased upon discovery.  Maxwell S.A. paid its Chinese agent approximately $165,000 in 2002 and increased the payments to the agent to nearly $1.1 million in 2008
  • Enforcement
  • On January 31, 2011, Maxwell entered into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement under which Maxwell agreed to pay an $8 million penalty and accept responsibility for violations of the FCPA’s anti-bribery and books and records provisions.  In addition, Maxwell agreed to adopt an enhanced compliance program and internal controls to prevent future violations, to cooperate with the DOJ in ongoing investigations, and to report periodically to the DOJ concerning its compliance efforts.  Maxwell also entered into a consent judgment in a related SEC action pursuant to which it agreed to pay $5.654 million in disgorgement of profits and $696,314 in prejudgment interest.
  • Amount of the Value
  • At least $2,789,131.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • Not Stated
  • Intermediary
  • Sales Agent; Consultant.
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 8,000,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No

Defendants

Maxwell Technologies, Inc.

  • Citation
  • United States v. Maxwell Techs., Inc., No. 3:11-cr-00329 (S.D. Cal. 2011).
  • Date Filed
  • 01/31/2011
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
    • Books-and-Records
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Deferred Prosecution Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United States
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel