Case Detail

United States v. Bridgestone Corporation (S.D. Tex. 2011)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • United States v. Bridgestone Corporation (S.D. Tex. 2011)
  • Date Filed
  • 09/15/2011
  • Enforcement Agency
  • DOJ
  • Countries
  • Mexico
  • Foreign Official
  • Government officials employed at unidentified state-owned entities.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 1999 to 2007
  • Nature of Business
  • Sale of marine hose in Mexico and other Latin American countries by Bridgestone International Products of America Inc. (“BIPA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bridgestone Corporation (“Bridgestone”).  Bridgestone is a Japanese corporation that manufactures and sells diversified industrial, chemical, and electronic products.  BIPA has offices in Nashville, Tennessee and Houston, Texas and sells Bridgestone’s industrial products in North, Central, and South America.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • From January 1999 through May 2007, Bridgestone authorized and approved corrupt payments to be made through BIPA’s local sales agents to foreign government officials at state-owned entities in Latin America.  The purpose of these payments was to secure contracts for its industrial products, including marine hose.  BIPA’s local sales agents would gather information about potential projects for Bridgestone and pay government officials a percentage of the total value of the proposed contracts for those projects.
     
    The proposed marine hose deals, including the corrupt payments, were approved by personnel at the International Engineering Products Department (“IEPD”) at Bridgestone.  Once IEPD approved the deal and corrupt payments, BIPA would place the bid through the local sales agents.  When BIPA secured the project, it paid the local sales agent a “commission” inflated by the amount of the corrupt payments to be made to employees of the state-owned customer.  The local sales agent was then responsible for making the agreed-upon corrupt payment to the employee of the state-owned customer.
     
  • Enforcement
  • On September 15, 2011, Bridgestone pleaded guilty to a two-count criminal information and agreed to pay a criminal fine of $28 million.  The information asserted one count for conspiracy to violate the Sherman Act, alleging that Bridgestone engaged in a bid-rigging and price-fixing conspiracy among major marine hose manufacturers from 1999 to 2007.  The information also alleged a second count for conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA.
     
    Previously, Hioki, a General Manager at IEPD, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the Sherman Act and another count of conspiracy to violate the FCPA in connection with the offenses alleged against Bridgestone, and was sentenced to 24 months in prison and ordered to pay an $80,000 criminal penalty.
     
    The DOJ cited Bridgestone’s extraordinary cooperation and its extensive remediation efforts as mitigating factors under the plea agreement.  On October 7, 2011, the Court approved the plea agreement and sentenced Bridgestone to a $28 million criminal penalty.
     
  • Amount of the Value
  • More than $2 million.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • $17,103,694.
  • Intermediary
  • Sales Agents.
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 28,000,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Regions
  • Latin Amer. & Carib

Defendants

Bridgestone Corporation 

  • Citation
  • United States v. Bridgestone Corp., No. 4:11–cr-00651 (S.D. Tex. 2011).
  • Date Filed
  • 09/15/2011
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Conspiracy: Anti-Bribery
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • Conspiracy (Antitrust).
  • Disposition
  • Plea Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • Japan
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel