Case Detail

United States v. AB Volvo (D.D.C. 2008)
United States v. Volvo Construction Equipment AB (D.D.C. 2008)
United States v. Renault Trucks SAS (D.D.C. 2008)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • United States v. AB Volvo (D.D.C. 2008)
    United States v. Volvo Construction Equipment AB (D.D.C. 2008)
    United States v. Renault Trucks SAS (D.D.C. 2008)
  • Date Filed
  • 03/20/2008
  • Enforcement Agency
  • DOJ
  • Countries
  • Iraq
  • Foreign Official
  • None
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2000 to 2003
  • Nature of Business
  • Sales of heavy commercial construction equipment and vehicles and other equipment to Iraq under the U.N. Oil-for-Food Program.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • In April 1995, the U.N. adopted Security Council Resolution 986, which permitted the government of Iraq to sell oil and to use proceeds from those sales to purchase humanitarian supplies such as food for the Iraqi people (“U.N. Oil-for-Food Program”).  In an extensive scheme, the Iraqi government received illicit payments in the form of surcharges from oil purchasers and kickbacks, often termed “after sales service fees,” from humanitarian goods suppliers.  The kickback payments were masked by inflating the contract price, usually by 10% of the contract value.  The government did not allege bribery of any individual foreign governmental officials.
     
    Volvo Construction Equipment (formerly Volvo Construction Equipment International, AB or “Volvo Construction”) is an international seller of heavy commercial construction equipment.  Between December 2000 and January 2003, Volvo Construction paid approximately $1.3 million in kickbacks to the Iraqi government, improperly labeled as “commission” payments in its books and records.  These kickbacks were included in various contract prices submitted by Volvo Construction and its distributors and ensured that Volvo Construction was awarded a total of approximately $13.8 million worth of contracts to supply construction vehicles to the Iraqi government.
     
    From November 2000 through April 2003, Renault Trucks SAS (“Renault”) entered into 17 contracts with various Iraqi ministries, including the 10% kickback payment.  In performing the contracts, Renault used a Swiss bodybuilder to tailor the requested vehicles to the Iraqi ministry’s specifications.  Renault provided extra payments to that company and was aware that these extra payments were being passed on to the Iraqi government to ensure that they were awarded additional contracts.  Overall, the Iraqi government received $4.8 million in kickbacks from Renault.  In return for these kickbacks, Renault Trucks SAS obtained contracts to supply vehicles and other equipment approximately worth €61 million.  
     
  • Enforcement
  • On March 20, 2008, AB Volvo (the parent company of Volvo Construction and Renault Trucks SAS) entered into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ.  Pursuant to the agreement, the DOJ filed two criminal informations against Volvo Construction and Renault respectively alleging conspiracy to commit wire fraud and to violate the FCPA’s books-and-records provisions.  Under the agreement, AB Volvo agreed to pay a fine totaling $7 million.  In June 2011, the Court granted the DOJ’s motion to dismiss the information against AB Volvo because it had complied with the terms of the DPA.  In addition, AB Volvo settled related charges with the SEC.  In March 2009, three unnamed executives at Volvo Construction were criminally charged by Swedish prosecutors for their involvement in the bribery scandal.  They could face jail sentences if convicted.
     
  • Amount of the Value
  • $6.1 million in kickbacks to the Iraqi government.
     
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • $13.8 million and €61 million.
  • Intermediary
  • Distributors and “Bodybuilder.”
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 7,000,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 19,602,649

Defendants

AB Volvo

  • Citation
  • United States v. AB Volvo, et al., No. 1:08-cr-00069 (D.D.C. 2008); 
  • Date Filed
  • 03/20/2008
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Deferred Prosecution Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • Sweden

Volvo Construction Equipment AB 

  • Citation
  • United States v. Volvo Const. Equip. AB, No. 1:08-cr-00069 (D.D.C. 2008); 
  • Date Filed
  • 03/20/2008
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Conspiracy: Books-and-Records
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • Conspiracy (Wire Fraud).
     
  • Disposition
  • Deferred Prosecution Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Conspiracy, Agent of Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • Sweden

Renault Trucks SAS 

  • Citation
  • United States. v. Renault Trucks SAS, No. 1:08-cr-00069 (D.D.C. 2008).
     
  • Date Filed
  • 03/20/2008
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Conspiracy
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • Conspiracy (Wire Fraud).
  • Disposition
  • Deferred Prosecution Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Conspiracy, Agent of Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • France
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel