Case Detail

SEC v. York Int’l Corp. (D.D.C. 2007)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • SEC v. York Int’l Corp. (D.D.C. 2007)
  • Date Filed
  • 10/02/2007
  • Enforcement Agency
  • SEC
  • Countries
  • Iraq, United Arab Emirates, India, China, Nigeria
  • Foreign Official
  • UAE government appointees and officials.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2000 to 2006
  • Nature of Business
  • Procurement of contracts to supply air compressors, air conditioners, air-cooled package units and spare parts to governmental entities in Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, and several other countries by York International Corporation (“York International”), a U.S. corporation, which is a major global supplier of heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration products.  York International is now owned by U.S.-based Johnson Controls.  York International maintained subsidiary entities around the world, including York Air Conditioning and Refrigeration FZE (“York FZE”) in Dubai and York Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Inc. (“York Inc.”), a Delaware corporation.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • In April 1995, the U.N. adopted Security Council Resolution 986, which permitted the government of Iraq to sell oil and to use proceeds from those sales to purchase humanitarian supplies such as food for the Iraqi people (“U.N. Oil‑for‑Food Program”).  In an extensive scheme, the Iraqi government received illicit payments in the form of surcharges from oil purchasers and kickbacks, often termed “after sales service fees,” from humanitarian goods suppliers.  The kickback payments were masked by inflating the contract price, usually by 10% of the contract value.  From 2000 to 2003, York FZE allegedly used a Jordanian company as an intermediary to make a series of indirect kickback payments to the Iraqi government in exchange for receiving contracts to supply its products to various Iraqi ministries and governmental departments.  In 2003 to 2004, York Inc. allegedly used one of its own employees to make payments to an intermediary, which is suspected of passing along the payments to governmental appointees responsible for managing the construction of a luxury hotel and convention complex.  From September 2001 through 2006, York International, through various subsidiaries, allegedly made hundreds of payments to secure government and private contracts in various countries.
  • Enforcement
  • On October 1, 2007, the SEC filed a complaint alleging that York International violated the anti‑bribery and books and records provisions of the FCPA and failed to maintain adequate internal controls.  Without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint, York International consented to the entry of a final judgment against it permanently enjoining it from future violations and ordering disgorgement of $8,949,132 in profits, plus $1,083,748 in interest, and a $2,000,000 civil penalty.  York International also was ordered to retain an independent compliance monitor.  The SEC noted that it took into consideration the company’s internal remedial actions, cooperation and the fact that it self‑reported these alleged violations.  The company also separately entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ, under which it agreed to pay a $10 million fine and to submit to the appointment of an independent monitor for its compliance program.  On October 1, 2010, the DOJ dismissed the criminal information on the basis that York International had fully complied with all of its obligations under the deferred prosecution agreement.
  • Amount of the Value
  • Approximately $15 million.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • Over $12.6 million.
  • Intermediary
  • Unnamed intermediaries.
  • Citizenship of Parent Entity
  • United States
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 12,032,880
  • Compliance Monitor
  • Yes
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 22,032,880
  • Regions
  • Eastern Europe, Middle East, Western Europe

Defendants

York Int’l Corp. 

  • Citation
  • SEC v. York Int’l Corp.,07-cv-1750 (D.D.C. 2007).
  • Date Filed
  • 10/02/2007
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
    • Books-and-Records
    • Internal Controls
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Complaint and Consent Order
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United States
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel