Case Detail

SEC v. VimpelCom Ltd (S.D.N.Y. 2016)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • SEC v. VimpelCom Ltd (S.D.N.Y. 2016)
  • Date Filed
  • 02/22/2016
  • Enforcement Agency
  • SEC
  • Countries
  • Uzbekistan
  • Foreign Official
  • Unnamed Uzbek government official and close relative of a high-ranking Uzbek government official, with significant influence over Uzbek telecommunication authorities.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2006 to 2012
  • Nature of Business
  • VimpelCom Ltd., headquartered in the Netherlands, is a global provider of telecommunications services.  VimpelCom is the sixth largest telecommunications company in the world, operating in Europe, Asia, and Africa.  It maintains a class of publicly traded securities on NASDAQ and, until 2013, a class of securities on the New York Stock Exchange.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • According to the SEC’s Complaint, between 2006 and 2012, VimpelCom paid an Uzbek government official over $114 million for access to the Uzbek telecommunications market and the acquisition of important Uzbek licenses and frequencies.  Court documents explain that the improper payments were primarily made through sham contracts with a shell company named Takilant Ltd., which VimpelCom knew to be beneficially owned by the official.  The SEC also claimed that other payments were made under the guise of legitimate charitable contributions and sponsorships.  According to the SEC, VimpelCom was able to generate more than $2.5 billion in revenues as a result of the scheme.
  • Enforcement
  • On February 18, 2016, the SEC announced that it had settled an FCPA enforcement action against VimpelCom for violations of the FCPA’s anti-bribery, books-and-records, and internal controls provisions.  The settlement required VimpelCom to pay $375 million in disgorgement.  Of the total disgorgement, $167.5 million was paid to Dutch regulators and $40 million was credited towards the DOJ’s criminal sanction.
  • Amount of the Value
  • Approximately $114 million.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • More than $2.5 billion.
  • Intermediary
  • Shell Company; Local Subsidiary.
  • Citizenship of Parent Entity
  • Netherlands
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 167,000,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • Yes
  • Reporting Requirements
  • Yes (3 Years)
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 795,326,398

Defendants

VimpelCom Ltd 

  • Citation
  • SEC v. VimpelCom Ltd, No. 1:16-cv-01266 (S.D.N.Y. 2016).
  • Date Filed
  • 02/22/2016
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
    • Books-and-Records
    • Internal Controls
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Complaint and Consent Order
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • Netherlands
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel