Case Detail

SEC v. Novo Nordisk A/S (D.D.C. 2009)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • SEC v. Novo Nordisk A/S (D.D.C. 2009)
  • Date Filed
  • 03/13/2009
  • Enforcement Agency
  • SEC
  • Countries
  • Iraq
  • Foreign Official
  • Kimadia, a state-owned company part of the Iraqi Ministry of Health.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2000 to 2003
  • Nature of Business
  • Novo Nordisk is an international manufacturer of insulin, medicines, and other pharmaceutical supplies headquartered in Denmark.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • In April 1995, the U.N. adopted Security Council Resolution 986, which permitted the government of Iraq to sell oil and to use proceeds from those sales to purchase humanitarian supplies such as food for the Iraqi people (“U.N. Oil‑for‑Food Program”).  In an extensive scheme, the Iraqi government received illicit payments in the form of surcharges from oil purchasers and kickbacks, often termed “after sales service fees,” from humanitarian goods suppliers.  The kickback payments were masked by inflating the contract price, usually by 10% of the contract value.

    According to the SEC’s complaint, Novo Nordisk paid illegal kickbacks to the former government of Iraq to secure contracts to provide insulin and other medical supplies to Iraq under the U.N. Oil‑for‑Food Program.  Allegedly, Novo Nordisk characterized these kickbacks as “after‑sales service fees,” but did not provide any bona fide services.  Branches of Novo Nordisk in Greece and Jordan handled the Iraqi sales.  Novo Nordisk allegedly inflated the price of contracts by 10% before submitting them to the United Nations for approval, and then made the illegal payments to Kimadia, a state‑owned company that was part of the Iraqi Ministry of Health, recording the payments as commissions in its books and records.
  • Enforcement
  • Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint, filed May 11, 2009, Novo consented, also on May 11, 2009, to entry of a final judgment (1) enjoining it from future books and records and internal controls FCPA violations; (2) ordering it to disgorge $4,321,523 in profits, plus $1,683,556 in prejudgment interest; and (3) ordering it to pay a civil penalty of $3,025,066.

    The SEC considered remedial acts Novo Nordisk promptly undertook and the cooperation it afforded the SEC in its investigation.  In a separate proceeding Novo Nordisk also agreed to pay a $9 million penalty under a deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ.
  • Amount of the Value
  • $1.4 million.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • €22 million.
  • Intermediary
  • Agent
  • Citizenship of Parent Entity
  • Denmark
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 9,030,145
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 18,030,145

Defendants

Novo Nordisk A/S 

  • Citation
  • SEC v. Novo Nordisk A/S, No. 1:09-cv-00862 (D.D.C. 2009).
  • Date Filed
  • 03/13/2009
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Books-and-Records
    • Internal Controls
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Complaint and Consent Order
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • Denmark
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel