Case Detail

SEC v. ENI, S.p.A. and Snamprogetti Netherlands B.V. (S.D. Tex. 2010)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • SEC v. ENI, S.p.A. and Snamprogetti Netherlands B.V. (S.D. Tex. 2010)
  • Date Filed
  • 07/20/2010
  • Enforcement Agency
  • SEC
  • Countries
  • Nigeria
  • Foreign Official
  • Officials in the executive branch of the Nigerian government, employees of Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, and employees of Nigeria LNG Limited, controlled by the Nigerian government.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 1995 to 2004
  • Nature of Business
  • Engineering, procurement, and construction (“EPC”) contracts for natural gas liquefaction facilities at Bonny Island in Nigeria (“Bonny Island Project”) as part of a four company joint venture.  Snamprogetti Netherlands B.V. (“Snamprogetti”) is a corporation organized under the laws of the Netherlands and headquartered in Amsterdam.  During the conduct at issue, Snamprogetti was a wholly owned subsidiary of ENI S.p.A. (“ENI”); it is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of Saipem S.p.A. (“Saipem”).
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • Snamprogetti participated in a joint venture to obtain and perform EPC contracts to build and expand the Bonny Island Project for Nigeria LNG Limited, which is owned in part by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation.  The joint venture was awarded four EPC contracts for the Bonny Island Project between 1995 and 2004.  From August 1994 until June 2004, Snamprogetti and its partners in the joint venture allegedly authorized, promised, and paid bribes to Nigerian government officials, including officials in the executive branch, employees of the government owned Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, and employees of government controlled Nigeria LNG Limited, to win and retain the EPC contracts to build the Bonny Island Project.  To conceal the bribes, the joint venture allegedly entered into sham consulting or services agreements with intermediaries and held “cultural meetings” where the joint venture partners met with their agents to plan how to pay the bribes.  Allegedly, the joint venture gave one consultant over $130 million for use in paying bribes to high level Nigerian government officials.  Another consultant, allegedly hired to bribe lower level Nigerian officials, received over $50 million to use for that purpose.  
  • Enforcement
  • On July 7, 2010, Snamprogetti and ENI entered into consent agreements to settle civil claims brought by the SEC in a complaint filed the same day by jointly agreeing to pay $125 million in disgorgement of the profits obtained as a result of the illicit payments.  In its complaint, the SEC alleged that Snamprogetti violated the FCPA’s anti-bribery provisions, and that both Snamprogetti and ENI violated the books-and-records and internal controls provisions of the FCPA.  Snamprogetti also settled a related criminal case with the DOJ by entering into a deferred prosecution agreement and agreeing to pay a $240 million fine.
  • Amount of the Value
  • Approximately $180 million.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • Over $6 billion.
  • Intermediary
  • Agents
  • Citizenship of Parent Entity
  • Italy
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 125,000,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 365,000,000

Defendants

ENI, S.p.A. 

  • Citation
  • SEC v. ENI, S.p.A., & Snamprogetti Netherlands B.V., No. 4:10-cv-02414 (S.D. Tex. 2010)
  • Date Filed
  • 07/20/2010
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Books-and-Records
    • Internal Controls
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Complaint and Consent Order
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • Italy

Snamprogetti Netherlands B.V. 

  • Citation
  • SEC v. ENI, S.p.A., & Snamprogetti Netherlands B.V., No. 4:10-cv-02414 (S.D. Tex. 2010).
  • Date Filed
  • 07/20/2010
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • Circumventing Internal Controls/Falsifying Books and Records.
  • Disposition
  • Complaint and Consent Order
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Agent of Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • Netherlands
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel