Case Detail

SEC v. Embraer, S.A. (S.D. Fla. 2016)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • SEC v. Embraer, S.A. (S.D. Fla. 2016)
  • Date Filed
  • 10/31/2016
  • Enforcement Agency
  • SEC
  • Countries
  • Dominican Republic, India, Mozambique, Saudi Arabia
  • Foreign Official
  • Former colonel of the Dominican Republic Air Force serving as representative during contract negotiations; Unnamed employees of a Saudi Arabian state-owned enterprise; Unnamed employees of a Mozambican state-owned airline; CEO of a Mozambican state-owned airline.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2005 to 2011
  • Nature of Business
  • Embraer, S.A. is a manufacturer and exporter of mid-sized commercial jets headquartered in São Paulo, Brazil.  Embraer also supplies defense aircraft for the Brazilian Air Force and other countries throughout Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America.  In 2015, Embraer employed over 22,000 employees and had revenues of just under $6 billion. During the relevant period of time, Embraer maintained a class of common shares that were registered with the SEC and were traded in the form of American Depository Receipts listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • According to the SEC, between 2005 and 2011, Embraer engaged in a series of improper business practices, including the bribery of foreign officials, in the Dominican Republic, Saudi Arabia, Mozambique, and India.  Those alleged improper practices are described below.

    Dominican Republic

    According to the SEC, between 2008 and 2010, Embraer paid $3.52 million to a government official from the Dominican Republic to obtain an aircraft contract valued at approximately $96.4 million. 

    Beginning in 2007, Embraer initiated efforts to sell a series of military aircrafts to the Dominican Republic’s air force.  The SEC claims that negotiations were managed by a “Dominican Official” who held himself out to be the “Director of Programs and Projects FAD” and was later appointed as the General Manager/Managing Director of Projects and Programs to the Secretary of the Armed Forces of the Dominican Republic. 

    During the course of negotiations, the SEC alleges that the Dominican Official demanded a commission in exchange for ensuring that the Dominican government would finance the purchase of Embraer’s aircrafts.  In September 2008, Embraer executives allegedly agreed to pay the Dominican Official a 3.7% commission on the $96.4 million contract (totaling $3.52 million).  The SEC claims that Embraer later allegedly executed consulting agreements with four separate Dominican agents to funnel the money to the Dominican Official.  Although Embraer’s legal department classified the agreements as “high risk,” Embraer executives were allegedly able to circumvent the company’s internal controls.

    Saudi Arabia

    According to the SEC, between 2009 and 2011, Embraer paid a Saudi Arabian government official $1.65 million to obtain a contract for the sale of three private jets to a Saudi Arabian state-owned entity. 

    Beginning in 2007, Embraer allegedly learned that an unnamed Saudi Arabian state-owned enterprise was interested in purchasing three used executive jets.  Later, in 2009, an official from the Saudi Arabian state-owned enterprise (the “Saudi Official”) allegedly told senior Embraer officials that he could convince the Saudi Arabian enterprise to purchase three new jets in exchange for an agreement to pay the Saudi Official a commission of $550,000 per aircraft.  After Embraer finalized the sale of three new executive jets to the Saudi Arabian state-owned enterprise in May 2010, Embraer allegedly funneled the $1.65 million commission to the Saudi Official through a South African company that was owned by an acquaintance of the Saudi Official.

    Mozambique

    According to the SEC, between May 2008 and September 2008, Embraer paid $800,000 to a Mozambican national (the “Mozambican Agent”) with connections to Mozambican government officials to obtain a contract valued at $65 million.  The SEC alleges that Embraer understood that at least a portion of the funds would be used to bribe Mozambican officials.

    Specifically, beginning in approximately May 2008, the SEC explains that Embraer entered into negotiations with a state-owned Mozambican airline for the sale of two aircrafts worth $65 million. The SEC claims that during the course of the negotiations the Mozambican Agent contacted at least one Embraer official with the instruction that Embraer should make a “gesture” to unidentified Mozambican government officials.  According to the SEC, the Mozambican Agent was a middleman for the government officials involved in the deal and Embraer officials believed they needed to pay the Mozambican Agent to win the contract.  After Embraer allegedly offered to pay the Mozambican between $50,000 and $80,000 per aircraft, the CEO of the Mozambican state-owned airline threatened to end the negotiations if Embraer did not make a “gesture” of between $800,000 and $1 million.  The SEC asserts that Embraer subsequently entered into a consulting agreement with the Mozambican Agent where Embraer agreed to pay a commission of $400,000 per aircraft.

    India 

    According to the SEC, between 2005 and 2009, Embraer paid $5.76 million to an Indian consultant who assisted the company to obtain a defense contract with the Indian Air Force worth $208 million.  The payments to the Indian consultant were made in spite of an Indian law that prohibited the use of agents for military sales.  To conceal the agreement, Embraer allegedly executed multiple consulting agreements with entities in the U.K. and Singapore to conceal a $5.76 million commission that the company ultimately sought to pay the Indian consultant.  The SEC claims that the transactions were misreported on Embraer’s books and records.
  • Enforcement
  • On October 24, 2016, the SEC announced that it had settled an FCPA enforcement action against Embraer for violations of the FCPA’s anti-bribery, books-and-records, and internal controls provisions.  As part of the resolution, Embraer agreed to disgorge $83,816,476 and pay prejudgment interest of $14,431,815.  Embraer also agreed to appoint an independent compliance monitor for a period of three years.  On the same day, the DOJ announced that it had reached a deferred prosecution agreement with Embraer in connection with a parallel FCPA enforcement action.  According to the DOJ, Embraer agreed to pay a criminal monetary penalty of $107,285,090.
  • Amount of the Value
  • Approximately $11.73 million.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • $83,248,291.
  • Intermediary
  • Local Consultants/Agents; Shell Companies.
  • Citizenship of Parent Entity
  • Brazil
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 98,248,291
  • Compliance Monitor
  • Yes
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 205,533,381

Defendants

SEC v. Embraer, S.A.

  • Citation
  • SEC v. Embraer, S.A., No. 0:16-cv-062501 (S.D. Fla. 2016).
  • Date Filed
  • 10/31/2016
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
    • Books-and-Records
    • Internal Controls
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Complaint and Consent Order
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • Brazil
  • Individual Sanction
  • $98,248,291 ($20,000,000 credit for disgorgement paid to Brazilian Authorities).
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel