Case Detail

SEC v. Michael L. Cohen (E.D.N.Y. 2017)
SEC v. Vanja Baros (E.D.N.Y. 2017)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • SEC v. Michael L. Cohen (E.D.N.Y. 2017)
    SEC v. Vanja Baros (E.D.N.Y. 2017)
  • Date Filed
  • 01/26/2017
  • Enforcement Agency
  • SEC
  • Countries
  • Chad, Congo, Dem. Rep., Guinea, Libya, Niger
  • Foreign Official
  • Unnamed foreign officials of Chad, Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea, Libya, and Niger.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2007 to 2012
  • Nature of Business
  • Michael L. Cohen, a dual citizen of the U.S. and U.K. residing in London, was a partner at Och-Ziff Capital Management LLC. Cohen worked closely with Vanja Baros, an Australian citizen residing in the U.K., who was an analyst in the private investments group at Och-Ziff’s European office. Och-Ziff, which is among the world’s largest hedge funds, provides investment advisory and management services in exchange for management fees and interest income. Och-Ziff’s common stock is registered with the SEC and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. In September 2016, Och-Ziff resolved an enforcement action by the DOJ and SEC for violations of the FCPA.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • The SEC claims that between 2007 and continuing through at least August 2012, Baros and Cohen allegedly executed multiple schemes involving corrupt transactions and bribes to high-ranking government officials in several African countries including Libya, Chad, Niger, Guinea, Congo, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. According to the SEC, Baros began working with Cohen at Och-Ziff in 2007 and participated in multiple corrupt transactions that aimed to secure Och-Ziff special access to investment opportunities in Africa, obtain or retain business for the hedge fund or its subsidiaries, and financially benefit themselves in the process.
     
    To facilitate the various schemes, Cohen and Baros, acting on behalf of Och-Ziff, allegedly engaged the services of multiple agents, intermediaries, and business partners who promoted themselves as having connections to high-ranking foreign government officials and, according to the SEC, typically had reputations for engaging in unsavory business practices. Baros and Cohen later allegedly funneled tens of millions of dollars (often from Och-Ziff investor accounts) to those agents, intermediaries, and business partners, knowing that at least of portion of those monies would be paid as bribes to government officials.
  • Enforcement
  • On January 26, 2017, the SEC filed a complaint against Baros and Cohen in the Eastern District of New York. The complaint charged Baros and Cohen with multiple violations of the FCPA, as well as multiple counts of aiding and abetting Och-Ziff’s violations of the FCPA and the Investment Advisers Act. Cohen was also separately charged with one substantive violation of the Investment Advisers Act.
     
    On July 12, 2018, the court granted Cohen’s and Baros’s motion to dismiss because the claims against them were outside the five-year statute of limitations period that applied to all of the forms of relief sought by the SEC.
  • Amount of the Value
  • Not Stated.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • Not Stated.
  • Intermediary
  • Customs Broker or Agent/Consultant; Sales Agent/Consultant.
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Industries
  • Finance & Banking

Defendants

Michael L. Cohen 

  • Citation
  • SEC v. Cohen & Baros, No. 1:17-cv-00430 (E.D.N.Y. 2017).
  • Date Filed
  • 01/26/2017
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Aiding and Abetting: Anti-Bribery
    • Aiding and Abetting: Books-and-Records
    • Aiding and Abetting: Internal Controls
    • Anti-Bribery
    • Internal Controls
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • Aiding and Abetting (Investment Adviser Fraud (Advisers Act Section 206(1), 206(2))).
  • Disposition
  • Pending
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Agent of Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • Australia
  • Individual Sanction
  • Pending

Vanja Baros 

  • Citation
  • SEC v. Cohen & Baros, No. 1:17-cv-00430 (E.D.N.Y. 2017).
  • Date Filed
  • 01/26/2017
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Aiding and Abetting: Anti-Bribery
    • Aiding and Abetting: Books-and-Records
    • Aiding and Abetting: Internal Controls
    • Anti-Bribery
    • Internal Controls
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • Aiding and Abetting (Investment Adviser Fraud (Advisers Act Section 206(1), 206(2))).
  • Disposition
  • Pending
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Agent of Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United States, United Kingdom
  • Individual Sanction
  • Pending
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel