Case Detail

SEC v. Alcatel Lucent, S.A. (S.D. Fla. 2010)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • SEC v. Alcatel Lucent, S.A. (S.D. Fla. 2010)
  • Date Filed
  • 12/30/2010
  • Enforcement Agency
  • SEC
  • Countries
  • Costa Rica, Honduras, Malaysia, Taiwan
  • Foreign Official
  • Officials of state-owned entities and government agencies including, but not limited to, Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad S.A. (Costa Rica); Empresa Hondureña de Telecomunicaciones (Honduras); Comisión Nacional de Telecomunicaciones (Honduras); Telekom Malaysia Berhad (Malaysia); and Taiwan Railway Administration (Taiwan).
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2001 to 2006
  • Nature of Business
  • Alcatel-Lucent, S.A. is a French-based provider of telecommunications equipment and services and other technology products.  It was created after the merger of Alcatel, S.A. (a French corporation) and Lucent Technologies, Inc. (a U.S. corporation) in 2006.  During the relevant period of time, Alcatel maintained a class of shares on the New York Stock Exchange pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • According to a complaint filed by the SEC, between 2001 and 2006, Alcatel S.A. (“Alcatel”) and its subsidiaries, including Alcatel CIT, S.A., Alcatel Standard, A.G., and Alcatel de Costa Rica, S.A., paid bribes to government officials in Costa Rica, Honduras, Taiwan, and Malaysia, to obtain or retain telecommunications contracts.  The payments were allegedly undocumented or improperly recorded as consulting fees in the books of Alcatel’s subsidiaries.  All of the alleged payments took place before Alcatel’s merger with Lucent Technologies in November 2006.  Lucent Technologies itself entered into a separate agreements in December 2007 with the DOJ and the SEC related to pre‑merger offenses.
  • Enforcement
  • On December 29, 2010, Alcatel‑Lucent consented to entry of a final judgment without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint, which had been filed on December 27, 2010.  Alcatel‑Lucent was ordered to pay disgorgement of $28,990,937 and prejudgment interest of $16,381,063, for a total of $45,372,000, and to engage an independent compliance monitor for a term of three years.

    On December 20, 2010, Alcatel‑Lucent entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ connected to similar charges.
  • Amount of the Value
  • Approximately $463 million.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • Not Stated.
  • Intermediary
  • Consultants; Subsidiaries.
  • Citizenship of Parent Entity
  • France
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 45,372,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • Yes
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 137,372,000

Defendants

Alcatel Lucent, S.A.

  • Citation
  • SEC v. Alcatel-Lucent, S.A., No. 10-cv-24620 (S.D. Fla. 2010).
  • Date Filed
  • 12/30/2010
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
    • Books-and-Records
    • Internal Controls
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Complaint and Consent Order
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • France
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel