Case Detail

In re Paradigm B.V. (2007)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • In re Paradigm B.V. (2007)
  • Date Filed
  • 09/21/2007
  • Enforcement Agency
  • DOJ
  • Countries
  • China, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Nigeria
  • Foreign Official
  • KazMunaiGas official; employees of Chinese national oil companies; Nigerian politicians; official of Pemex, the Mexican national oil company; officials of Pertamina, the Indonesian national oil company.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2002 to 2007
  • Nature of Business
  • Paradigm, a Dutch company previously located in Israel and now headquartered in Houston, Texas, is a provider of enterprise software solutions to the oil and gas exploration and production industry.  Paradigm’s software is used to create dynamic digital models of the Earth’s subsurface by analyzing and interpreting large quantities of data. 
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • Paradigm’s current management first learned of the improper payments while conducting due diligence in preparation for listing its shares on U.S. stock exchanges.  It thereafter retained counsel to conduct an internal investigation, implemented a new compliance program, and made a voluntary disclosure to the DOJ.  According to the pleadings, Paradigm made the following payments for the following purposes:
    • Kazakhstan:  Paradigm made a payment into the Latvian bank account of a British West Indies company recommended as a consultant by a KazMunaiGas official to secure a tender in Kazakhstan for geological software.  
    • China:  Paradigm’s subsidiary used an agent in China to make commission payments to representatives of Zhonghai Petroleum (China) Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of the China National Offshore Oil Company (“CNOOC”), in connection with the sale of software.  In addition, the company directly retained Chinese national oil and gas companies’ employees as “internal consultants” to evaluate Paradigm’s software, to influence procurement decisions, and to inspect and accept delivered software.  These “internal consultants” were paid in cash.  Finally, the company paid for travel, including sightseeing trips, for the “internal consultants” and other employees of the Chinese national oil and gas companies.
    • Nigeria:  Paradigm agreed to make payments through an agent to politicians to obtain a services contract with Integrated Data Services Limited, a subsidiary of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corp. (“NNPC”), but did not get the contract.  
    • Mexico:  Paradigm used an agent in connection with a subcontract with the Mexican Bureau of Geophysical Contracting (“BGP”), without a written agency agreement.  The agent requested his commission payments be paid through five different entities.  Paradigm Mexico also took a decision-maker of Pemex, Mexico’s national oil company, accompanied by the agent in the BGP deal, on a birthday trip to Napa Valley, California, in connection with another contract, and also spent large sums entertaining the same person at other times.  Paradigm Mexico hired this official’s brother as a driver.  The official then awarded a third contract with another branch of Pemex to Paradigm.  
    • Indonesia:  Paradigm used an agent who was involved in making payments “for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business” from Pertamina, the national oil company.
     
  • Enforcement
  • On October 1, 2007, York International entered into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement (“DPA”) with the DOJ.  The criminal information attached to the agreement charges York International with wire fraud and violation of the books and records provisions of the FCPA, as well as conspiracy to commit such offenses.  York International agreed to pay a $10 million fine and to submit to the appointment of an independent monitor for its compliance program.  On October 1, 2010, the DOJ dismissed the criminal information on the basis that York International had fully complied with all of its obligations under the DPA, including (i) payment of the $10 million penalty; (ii) full cooperation with the government; and (iii) improvement of its compliance policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the FCPA and other applicable anti-corruption laws, as certified by the independent monitor.  In a related SEC litigation, the company also separately consented to the entry of final judgment enjoining it from further violations and to pay over $10 million in disgorgement and interest, as well a $2 million civil penalty.
  • Amount of the Value
  • .  $22,500 in Kazakhstan.  Although the pleadings did not list the total amount of payments elsewhere, they noted payments of $100-200 per official in China, commission payments of several hundred thousand in Mexico, and an agreement to make corrupt payments of between $100,000 and 200,000 through an agent in Nigeria, in addition to extensive improper entertainment and travel.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • Total is not stated; $249,290 in Kazakhstan; First contract in Mexico was $1.48 million.
  • Intermediary
  • Frontera Holding, a British West Indies “consultant” (for Kazakhstan); Tangshan Haitai Oil Technology Consulting Co. Ltd. in China; unnamed agents for Nigeria, Indonesia.
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 1,000,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • Yes
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No

Defendants

Paradigm B.V. (2007)

  • Citation
  • In re Paradigm B.V. (2007).
  • Date Filed
  • 09/21/2007
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
    • Books-and-Records
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Non-Prosecution Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Domestic Concern
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United States
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel