Case Detail

In re Armor Holdings Inc. (2011)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • In re Armor Holdings Inc. (2011)
  • Date Filed
  • 07/13/2011
  • Enforcement Agency
  • DOJ
  • Countries
  • Indonesia, Iraq
  • Foreign Official
  • Officials at the United Nations and other unspecified government customers.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2001 to 2006
  • Nature of Business
  • Manufacture and sales of military, law enforcement, and personal safety equipment by Armor Holdings Inc. (“Armor Holdings”), a Delaware corporation.  On July 31, 2007, after the conduct described in the complaint occurred, Armor Holdings was acquired by BAE Systems Inc., an indirect wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary of Britain’s BAE Systems PLC.  
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • From September 2001 through 2006, certain agents of Armor Holdings made corrupt payments to an U.N. procurement official to induce that official to provide non-public, inside information to an Armor Holdings subsidiary and to cause the U.N. to award body armor contracts to that subsidiary.  Armor Holdings made more than $200,000 in commissions payments to an independent sales agent, a portion of which was forwarded to the U.N. procurement official.  Armor Holdings employees falsely recorded the nature and purpose of these improper payments in Armor Holdings’ books and records.
     
    An Armor Holdings subsidiary also allegedly employed a separate accounting practice that disguised additional commissions paid to third-party intermediaries who brokered the sale of goods to foreign governments.  Even after being warned by internal and external accountants that this practice violated U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Armor Holdings’ subsidiary continued the improper accounting practice.  As a result, approximately $4.4 million in commissions was not properly disclosed in the books and records of the company.
     
  • Enforcement
  • On July 13, 2011, Armor Holdings entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the DOJ, under which it agreed to pay a monetary penalty of $10,290,000.  
     
    Separately, in an agreement with the SEC, Armor Holdings consented to entry of a permanent injunction against further violations and agreed to pay $1,552,306 in disgorgement, $458,438 in prejudgment interest, and a civil money penalty of $3,680,000.  
     
  • Amount of the Value
  • Approximately $4.6 million.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • Approximately $6,000,000.
  • Intermediary
  • Agent; Consultant.
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 10,290,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • Yes
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 15,980,744

Defendants

Armor Holdings Inc.

  • Citation
  • In re Armor Holdings Inc. (2011).
  • Date Filed
  • 07/13/2011
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Non-Prosecution Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United States
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel