Case Detail

In re Aon Corporation (2011)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • In re Aon Corporation (2011)
  • Date Filed
  • 12/20/2011
  • Enforcement Agency
  • DOJ
  • Countries
  • Costa Rica, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, Egypt, Indonesia, Myanmar, Panama, United Arab Emirates, Vietnam
  • Foreign Official
  • Officials at the Instituto Nacional De Seguros (“INS”), Costa Rica’s state-owned insurance company.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 1997 to 2005
  • Nature of Business
  • Reinsurance contracts for Aon Limited, a U.K. subsidiary of Aon Corporation (“Aon”).  Aon, a Delaware corporation headquartered in Chicago, is one of the largest insurance brokerage firms in the world.  The company’s primary business activities involve risk management services, insurance, and reinsurance brokerage.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • In 1997, Aon Limited acquired the British insurance brokerage firm Alexander Howden and took over management of a “training and education” fund set up by Alexander Howden in connection with its reinsurance business with INS.  The purported purpose of the fund was to provide education and training for INS officials.  Beginning in 1997, Aon Limited contributed to this fund by allocating a portion of the brokerage commission on its INS account to the fund each year.  By 2002, approximately $215,000 was deposited in the funds.  Beginning in 1999, at INS’s request, Aon Limited also managed a second “training account” that was funded by contributions from other reinsurers of 3% of the premiums paid under reinsurance contracts with INS.
     
    Between 1997 and 2005, Aon Limited used nearly all of the money contributed to these funds to reimburse INS officials for non-training related activity, including travel with spouses to overseas tourist destinations.  Although some of these trips were in connection with conferences and seminars, many of the invoices and other records for trips taken by INS officials did not provide any business purpose for the expenditures, or showed that the expenses were clearly not related to a legitimate business purpose.  A majority of the money paid from the funds was disbursed to a Costa Rican tourism company for which the director of the INS reinsurance department served on the board of directors.
     
    According to the non-prosecution agreement, Aon also disclosed facts relating to improper payments in Bangladesh, Bulgaria, Egypt, Indonesia, Myanmar, Panama, the United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam.
     
  • Enforcement
  • Aon entered a two-year non-prosecution agreement on December 20, 2011.  As part of that agreement, Aon admitted that Aon Limited’s accounting books and records related to the funds were inaccurate and that it failed to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls with respect to foreign sales activities sufficient to ensure compliance with the FCPA.  Aon agreed to pay a $1.764 million penalty to resolve violations of the FCPA.  In addition to the monetary penalty, Aon Corporation must adhere to rigorous compliance, bookkeeping, and internal controls standards and cooperate fully with the DOJ. 
     
    In December 2009, Aon Limited was fined £5.25 million under a settlement with the U.K.’s Financial Services Authority (“FSA”) for failure to establish internal controls sufficient to detect potentially corrupt payments made to third parties in Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, Burma, Indonesia, and Vietnam.  The DOJ noted that the financial penalty already paid to the U.K. FSA by Aon Limited for improper conduct in some of these countries, and the FSA’s continued supervision of AON Limited, contributed to the DOJ’s decision to enter the non-prosecution agreement with Aon.
     
  • Amount of the Value
  • $865,000.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • $1,840,200.
  • Intermediary
  • A tourism company associated with a government official.
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 1,764,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 16,309,020

Defendants

Aon Corporation 

  • Citation
  • In re Aon Corp. (2011).
  • Date Filed
  • 12/20/2011
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
    • Books-and-Records
    • Internal Controls
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Non-Prosecution Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Issuer
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United States
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel