Case Detail

United States v. Goodyear Int’l Corp. (D.D.C. 1989)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • United States v. Goodyear Int’l Corp. (D.D.C. 1989)
  • Date Filed
  • 05/11/1989
  • Enforcement Agency
  • DOJ
  • Foreign Official
  • An official of the Iraqi Trading Company, an Iraqi state-owned trading organization, through which the Iraqi government purchased virtually all of the tires for sale in Iraq.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 1978 to 1984
  • Nature of Business
  • Marketing of car and truck tires to the Iraqi government by Goodyear Int’l Corp. (“Goodyear”), a Delaware corporation and a domestic concern.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • In early 1978, an employee (the Employee) of the Middle East regional export manager for Goodyear International Corp. (GIC), met with officials of the Iraqi state-owned trading organization, Iraqi Trading Company (ITC), which purchases virtually all of the tires for sale in Iraq.  In a private meeting with the Employee, one of the ITC officials, Mohammed Jassem, informed the Employee that GIC's competitors in France, Korea, and Japan had been willing to pay cash commissions to ensure "good relationships" with ITC and that it would only get a limited amount of business with ITC without such payments.  The Employee initially declined but, after getting pressured from his superiors to get the business despite ITC's request, later negotiated a 7% cash commission for the ITC officials.  Following this agreement, GIC received over $19 million worth of business from ITC through three transactions. 
     
    The Employee and other GIC officials used advertising agencies to cover the cash commissions to be paid to the ITC officials.  In one instance, they engaged a Greek company to conduct "marketing studies," who provided a very superficial report.  The invoiced amount was deposited into the Greek company's bank account in the Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS).  The Employee opened an account under his name in the same bank, and a substantial portion of the invoiced amount was then transferred to the Employee's account.  The Employee withdrew money from this account to pay the ITC officials.  In another instance, the Employee and other GIC officials had false invoices prepared on the letterhead of a defunct advertising agency for purportedly placing Arabic advertisements in Baghdad newspapers.  The invoiced amounts were deposited into an account in UBS which was opened under the name of the defunct advertising agency for this specific purpose.  The Employee then transferred the money into his account at UBS. 
     
  • Enforcement
  • As a result of the conduct described above, Goodyear pled guilty to the single count of violating the FCPA bribery section and was fined $250,000.
  • Amount of the Value
  • $981,124, a 7% payment on sale of tires.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • $10 million in business.
  • Intermediary
  • Use of a Greek company and Goodyear’s advertising manager for Greece to prepare bogus advertising and marketing studies to conceal payments of cash to representatives of Iraqi foreign officials in Switzerland.
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 250,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 250,000

Defendants

Goodyear Int’l Corp. 

  • Citation
  • United States v. Goodyear Int’l Corp., No. 89-cr-0156 (D.D.C. 1989).
  • Date Filed
  • 05/11/1989
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Anti-Bribery
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Plea Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Domestic Concern
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United States
  • Individual Sanction
  • 250000
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel