Case Detail

United States v. F.G. Mason Engineering, Inc. and Francis G. Mason (D. Conn. 1990)


Case Details

  • Case Name
  • United States v. F.G. Mason Engineering, Inc. and Francis G. Mason (D. Conn. 1990)
  • Date Filed
  • 06/01/1990
  • Enforcement Agency
  • DOJ
  • Countries
  • Germany
  • Foreign Official
  • An official responsible for selection, procurement and testing of Technical Security equipment for the then West German Military Intelligence Service (“MAD”), an agency of the West German government.
  • Date of Conduct
  • 1983 to 1989
  • Nature of Business
  • Mason Engineering, Inc. (“MEI”) is a Connecticut corporation that manufactures, develops, and sells technical security countermeasure (TSCM) equipment, or “anti-bugging” devices used to detect the presence of electronic surveillance.  Co-defendant Francis Mason is the founder, sole-owner, and President of MEI.
  • Influence to be Obtained
  • MEI started selling TSCM equipment and related products to the German military intelligence service (known as “MAD”), in the 1960s.  The sales were made through a middleman from the mid 1970s.  In or around April 1983, Dirk Ekkehard Zoeller, an officer of MAD, contacted Mason seeking to eliminate the middleman.  Zoeller was responsible for procurement, testing, inspection and acceptance of TSCM equipment on behalf of MAD.  On July 13, 1984, MEI and Zoeller entered into a written contract, which provided that MEI would pay Zoeller a 13.3% commission on every sale of MEI equipment to MAD. Three years later, Zoeller and Mason also agreed that MAD would grant exclusive “general alignment” service contracts to MEI in exchange for a 50-50 fee split. 
    Over a period of five years, Zoeller granted MEI over $1.4 million in equipment and service contracts and received over $225,000 in return.  During the course of the conspiracy, Zoeller also provided information and guidance on the amount MEI should charge to MAD for its equipment and services.  MEI used this information to artificially inflate its prices to MAD. 
     
  • Enforcement
  • MEI pleaded guilty to a single count of conspiracy to violate the FCPA, agreed to cooperate, was fined $75,000 (jointly with its president, Mason) and agreed to pay restitution of $160,000 to the West German government.  Mason pleaded guilty to a single count of conspiracy to violate the FCPA, was sentenced to five years’ probation, and was fined $75,000 jointly with Mason Engineering.
  • Amount of the Value
  • 13.3% commission, an aggregate of $225,688.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • Not Stated
  • Intermediary
  • None
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 235,000
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 235,000

Defendants

F.G. Mason Engineering, Inc. 

  • Citation
  • United States. v. F.G. Mason Eng’g Inc., No. B-90-29 (D. Conn. 1990).
  • Date Filed
  • 06/01/1990
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Conspiracy: Anti-Bribery
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Plea Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Domestic Concern
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United States
  • Individual Sanction
  • $235,000.

Francis G. Mason 

  • Citation
  • United States. v. F.G. Mason Eng’g Inc., No. B-90-29 (D. Conn. 1990).
  • Date Filed
  • 06/01/1990
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
    • Conspiracy: Anti-Bribery
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • None
  • Disposition
  • Plea Agreement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Conspiracy, Agent of Domestic Concern
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United States
  • Individual Sanction
  • 60-Months Probation; $235,000.
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.aoshearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel